电力碳足迹因子对钢铁行业产品碳足迹的影响研究

Research on the influence of electricity carbon footprint factor on the carbon footprint of steel industry products

  • 摘要: 钢铁工业作为国民经济的基础产业,既是能源消耗密集型部门,也是全球碳排放的重要来源。在应对气候变化和实现“双碳”目标的背景下,产品碳足迹逐渐成为国际贸易与供应链竞争力的核心指标。由于单位产品碳足迹较高,我国钢铁行业在可持续发展方面面临严峻挑战。本文基于生命周期评价(Life Cycle Assessment, LCA)方法,核算了典型钢铁企业的三种粗钢生产工艺的产品碳足迹,包括长流程(高炉—转炉)、45%废钢比电炉短流程以及全废钢电炉短流程。同时,采用电网排放因子计算方法,对我国区域及省级2018—2022年的年度电力碳足迹因子进行了测算与分析。研究结果表明,电力消耗是钢铁生产碳排放的重要影响因素,不同工艺路线的电力碳足迹贡献差异显著:长流程粗钢的电力碳排放仅占总碳足迹的约7%,45%废钢比电炉短流程占比约20%,而全废钢电炉短流程则高达约58%。此外,我国区域及省级电力结构差异明显,例如四川、云南等水电占比较高的地区,其电力碳足迹因子低于0.40 kgCO2e·(kWh)-1;而山西、内蒙古等火电占主导的地区则超过1.05 kgCO2e·(kWh)-1。研究表明,通过优化钢铁产能的空间布局、提高清洁能源发电占比以及扩大电炉短流程产能,可有效降低我国钢铁行业的产品碳足迹。本文首次系统量化了电力碳足迹因子在不同钢铁生产工艺中的影响权重,可为我国钢铁行业低碳转型路径规划及区域能源结构优化提供参考。

     

    Abstract: The iron and steel industry, serving as a foundational sector of the national economy, represents a significant energy-consuming industry and a major source of global carbon emissions. Against the backdrop of global climate change mitigation and China’s “Dual Carbon” goals, product carbon footprint has evolved into a critical metric influencing international trade and supply chain competitiveness. Owing to its relatively high carbon intensity per unit of product, the Chinese steel industry confronts substantial challenges in pursuing sustainable development. This study employs the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology to quantify the product carbon footprints of three typical crude steel production routes within representative iron and steel enterprises: the blast furnace–basic oxygen furnace (BF–BOF) long process, the electric arc furnace (EAF) short process utilizing 45% scrap input, and the full-scrap EAF short process. Furthermore, based on the grid emission factor approach, this research calculates and analyzes the annual carbon footprint factors of grid electricity at regional and provincial levels in China from 2018 to 2022. Findings reveal that electricity consumption constitutes a key contributing factor to carbon emissions in steel manufacturing, with the proportion of electricity-related carbon emissions varying markedly across production routes: approximately 7% for the BF–BOF route, around 20% for the EAF route with 45% scrap ratio, and as high as 58% for the full-scrap EAF process. Moreover, significant spatial heterogeneity is observed in regional and provincial electricity generation structures. Regions endowed with abundant hydropower resources, such as Sichuan and Yunnan, exhibit carbon footprint factors below 0.40 kgCO2e·(kWh)?1, whereas those heavily reliant on thermal power generation, including Shanxi and Inner Mongolia, record values exceeding 1.05 kgCO2e·(kWh)?1. This study underscores that strategic optimization of the spatial distribution of steel production capacity, enhancing the share of clean energy in power generation, and expanding EAF-based short-process steelmaking can collectively contribute to reducing the product carbon footprint of China’s iron and steel industry. This study is the first to systematically quantify the influence of electricity carbon footprint factors across different steelmaking processes, providing a reference for planning low-carbon transition pathways in China’s steel industry and for optimizing regional energy structures.

     

/

返回文章
返回