SCCO2-LCO2顺序作用下煤体表面粗糙度演化与力学劣化机理研究

Study on Evolution of Surface Roughness and Mechanism of Mechanical Deterioration of Coal Mass under the Sequential Action of SCCO2-LCO2

  • 摘要: 煤层注CO2(二氧化碳)压裂或驱替强化瓦斯抽采过程中,SCCO2(超临界CO2)-LCO2(液态CO2)序贯处理对煤岩微观结构及力学性质的影响机制尚不明确。为了揭示这一关键机制,本文以无烟煤为研究对象,开展SCCO2-LCO2的序贯处理实验,结合纳米压痕技术与光学三维形貌分析手段,系统研究了序贯处理对煤体表面微观结构与力学性质的改造过程。实验结果表明:微观结构层面,SCCO2作用后,水平方向上煤体二维粗糙度增大幅度为2.37%~42.60%,三维粗糙度参数普遍增大,Sa(算术平均高度)增大幅度为0.19%-217.50%;Sdr(界面扩展面积比)增大幅度为2.90%-116.58%;Sq(三维均方根高度)增大幅度为3.14%-204.17%;LCO2接续处理后垂直方向的煤体二维粗糙度降幅范围为-2.41%~-67.89%,三维粗糙度则多数回落,Sa减小幅度为0.46%-56.18%;Sdr减小幅度为0.32%-40.04%;Sq减小幅度为2.58%-52.20%)。微观力学性质层面,SCCO2处理使煤体平均弹性模量与硬度分别下降5.38%和8.5%,弹性能占比由初始的82%左右降至处理后的77%附近;LCO2接续处理后,煤体平均弹性模量与硬度进一步下降5.19%和1.17%,呈现累积弱化趋势,但是弹性能占比并未出现显著变化。归一化相关性分析结果表明,煤体弹性模量与硬度测试数据的收敛与离散反映了不同相态CO2作用机理的差异性。SCCO2处理后导致了煤体非均质性增强,而接续的LCO2处理并未加剧煤体非均质化。本文从微观尺度揭示了SCCO2与LCO2序贯作用对煤体结构的差异化改造机理,为优化CO2注入工艺提升封存安全性与瓦斯采收率提供了理论与实验依据。

     

    Abstract: During CO? injection fracturing or displacement-enhanced coalbed methane extraction, the mechanism by which sequential supercritical CO? (SCCO?)-liquid CO? (LCO?) treatment affects coal’s microstructure and mechanical properties remains unclear. To address this, anthracite was used as the research object, with sequential SCCO?-LCO? treatment experiments conducted combined with nanoindentation and optical 3D topography analysis to systematically investigate the modification effects. Microstructurally, SCCO? treatment increased coal’s horizontal 2D roughness by 2.37%~42.60% and most 3D roughness parameters (arithmetic mean height: 0.19%~217.50%; interfacial area expansion ratio: 2.90%~116.58%; 3D root mean square height: 3.14%~204.17%), whereas subsequent LCO? treatment reduced vertical 2D roughness by -2.41%~-67.89% and most 3D roughness parameters (arithmetic mean height: 0.46%~56.18%; interfacial area expansion ratio: 0.32%~40.04%; 3D root mean square height: 2.58%~52.20%). Micromechanically, SCCO? treatment decreased coal’s average elastic modulus by 5.38% and hardness by 8.5%, with the elastic energy ratio falling from ~82% to ~77%; subsequent LCO? treatment caused a further 5.19% decrease in elastic modulus and 1.17% in hardness (cumulative weakening) without significant change in elastic energy ratio. Normalized correlation analysis indicated that the convergence/dispersion of elastic modulus and hardness data reflects distinct CO? phase mechanisms: SCCO? enhanced coal heterogeneity, while LCO? did not exacerbate it. This study reveals the differential modification mechanism of sequential SCCO?-LCO? action on coal structure at the microscale, providing theoretical and experimental support for optimizing CO? injection to improve sequestration safety and coalbed methane recovery.

     

/

返回文章
返回