赵熙, 鞠杨, 郑泽民. 混合型应力强度因子的光弹性多参数测定[J]. 工程科学学报, 2017, 39(8): 1288-1294. DOI: 10.13374/j.issn2095-9389.2017.08.020
引用本文: 赵熙, 鞠杨, 郑泽民. 混合型应力强度因子的光弹性多参数测定[J]. 工程科学学报, 2017, 39(8): 1288-1294. DOI: 10.13374/j.issn2095-9389.2017.08.020
ZHAO Xi, JU Yang, ZHENG Ze-min. Multiple parameter measurement of mixed-mode stress intensity factors using the photoelastic method[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering, 2017, 39(8): 1288-1294. DOI: 10.13374/j.issn2095-9389.2017.08.020
Citation: ZHAO Xi, JU Yang, ZHENG Ze-min. Multiple parameter measurement of mixed-mode stress intensity factors using the photoelastic method[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering, 2017, 39(8): 1288-1294. DOI: 10.13374/j.issn2095-9389.2017.08.020

混合型应力强度因子的光弹性多参数测定

Multiple parameter measurement of mixed-mode stress intensity factors using the photoelastic method

  • 摘要: 提高裂纹尖端应力强度因子值的计算精度,对于准确分析受力结构的起裂条件和破坏模式具有重要意义.本文采用3D打印技术获得了不含残余应力的平板模型,高精度打印预置裂纹避免了传统加工过程产生残余应力的缺点;综合考虑奇异场和非奇异场对裂纹尖端区域应力场的影响,引入远场边界控制的三个常数项应力,提出了光弹性多参数法;采用三点弯曲试验,运用最小二乘法计算了不同载荷下纯I型和I-Ⅱ混合型应力强度因子值,并与理论解对比分析.结果表明:对于纯I型应力强度因子,计算结果的平均误差为6.1%,对于I-Ⅱ混合型应力强度因子,计算结果的平均误差分别为6.4%和5.5%,多参数法与理论解相比较小的计算误差验证了该方法的可靠性和准确性,可为精确计算应力强度因子的光弹性实验研究提供借鉴.

     

    Abstract: Precise calculation of the stress intensity factors at crack tips is of great significance in accurate analysis of a structure's crack initiation and fracture mode. In this research, a three-dimensional printing technique was adopted to manufacture a non-residual stress plate model, where high-precision printed pre-cracks avoid the occurrence of residual stress compared to traditional manufacturing processes. By comprehensively considering the singular and non-singular stresses at the near-crack-tip region, three constant stresses controlled by the far field were adopted. Multiple parameters of the photoelastic method combined with the least-squares method were applied to analyze the stress intensity factors of mode I and mixed modes in three-point bending tests under different loads, and a theoretical solution comparison was conducted. Results show that compared with the theoretical solution, the average calculation error for the mode I stress intensity factor is 6.1% and those for I-Ⅱ mixed modes are 6.4% and 5.5%, respectively. This slight calculation error verifies the reliability and accuracy of the multiple-parameter method and provides a reference for further precise calculations of the stress intensity factors using the photoelastic method.

     

/

返回文章
返回